top of page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

Revolutionizing Pet Custody, One Case at a Time

liz9573

Updated: Jan 17

Most people who have pets see them as family, not property. Dogs wearing pajamas take up all the room on the bed. Cats take over the couch–and often, the whole house–and the humans gladly acquiesce to their demands. They are confidants, friends, snuggle companions.


Yet, when disputes over their custody arise, the law often struggles to reconcile their status as property with the emotional bonds they share with their humans, and many people are faced with the loss of a beloved pet because there is often no legal recourse.  

Boston Dog Lawyers has been at the forefront of this evolving area of law, advocating for the rights of pets and their owners.


In Massachusetts, pets are traditionally considered personal property under the law. This classification can make custody disputes particularly challenging, as the emotional and relational value of pets is often overlooked in legal proceedings. However, the courts are beginning to recognize that pets hold a unique place in our lives, requiring a more nuanced approach to their custody.





Landmark Case: Lyman v. Lanser 

One of the most significant moments in Massachusetts pet custody law was the Lyman v. Lanser case. This dispute involved a former couple fighting over the custody of their dog, with each party claiming to be the more suitable caregiver. Brett Lyman, the party represented by Boston Dog Lawyers, was granted “joint custody” of Teddy Bear the pomeranian, whom he co-owned with his former girlfriend. He became the first owner of a companion animal in the state to win this kind of shared custody arrangement.


By considering Lyman’s rights, as well as recognizing that Teddy Bear and other companion animals are special and unique personal property, the case set a new precedent for future disputes. 


How Pet Custody Laws Differ Across States Pet custody laws vary widely across the United States. In many states, pets are still treated strictly as property, with decisions made based on ownership documentation. However, some states, such as Alaska, Illinois, and California, have begun incorporating provisions that allow courts to consider the well-being of the pet. This shift reflects a growing recognition of the unique role pets play in our lives and the need for a more compassionate legal framework.


Considerations for Pet Owners Facing Custody Disputes If you find yourself in a custody dispute over a pet, there are several steps you can take to strengthen your case for custody:


  1. Document Your Relationship: Keep records of vet visits, training sessions, photographs, and other evidence that demonstrate your bond with the pet. Additionally, document any discussions or agreements about custody in the case of a breakup. 

  2. Consider Mediation: Mediation can often lead to a more amicable resolution and reduce the stress on all parties, including the pet.

  3. Understand Your Rights: Pet owners need to know that they have rights and a place to bring their case to seek a fair outcome. 


The Lyman v. Lanser case was a pivotal moment in acknowledging the profound bond between pets and their owners and the devastating consequences of losing access to a beloved pet. As pet owners, proactively planning for unexpected situations and standing up for your pet’s well-being can be transformative. We remain optimistic that the law will continue to evolve, honoring the deep and meaningful relationships we share with our furry family members.


65 views0 comments

Comments


CONTACT US

450 B Paradise Rd. # 289

Swampscott, MA 01907

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Thank You for Subscribing!

Potential clients are encouraged to provide their information below to receive a callback within one business day.

Please Note: We are not presently handling veterinary malpractice cases. 

Advisory: Your further communication with Boston Dog Lawyers (BDL) indicates your express acknowledgment and informed consent that you should not provide any confidential information and if you do, this will not prohibit any lawyer at BDL from representing a different or opposing party in the matter. You should limit the information provided at the intake stages to your contact information and the general nature of your concern. Any claim that BDL is disqualified from representing an adverse party because information considered confidential was provided by the prospective client is expressly waived. Any communications between BDL and the prospective client do not constitute legal advice and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. The information provided on this website does not constitute legal advice and by contacting BDL you understand that no attorney-client relationship has been created nor will one be created until we have a mutually agreed-upon and fully executed written contract for legal services.

© 2024 by Boston Dog Lawyers. All rights reserved.

bottom of page